Cantor’s Diagonal Argument
1890/91, Cantor (1845-1918)
THEOREM:
- Suppose that . Then there is a bijection
- Let for
- is in
- must have a preimage
- however, for every
- cannot be a bijection
Cantor’s Theorem
THEOREM (Cantor) Let be any set. Then .
- : the power set of a set , i.e., the set of all subsets of
- For example:
- The function defined by is injective.
- Assume that there is a bijection
- Define two lists () and ()
- Define
- We must have that .
- for some
- If , then
- If , then
The Halting Problem
Function
- : a program; : an input to the program .
QUESTION: Is there a Turing machine computing ?
- Turing machine: can be represented as an element of
- : the set of all finite bit strings
THEOREM: There is no Turing machine computing .
- Assume there is a Turing machine computing
- Define a new Turing machine that runs on any Turing machine
- If “halts”, loops forever
- If “loops forever”, halts
- loops forever “halts” halts
- halts “loops forever” loops forever
Countable and Uncountable
DEFINITION: A set is countable if or ; otherwise, it is said to be uncountable.
- countably infinite:
EXAMPLE: are countable; are uncountable.
THEOREM: A set is countably infinite if and only if its elements can be arranged as a sequence
- If is countably infinite, then there is a bijection
- for every
- If , then the defined by is a bijection
THEOREM: Let be countably infinite, then any infinite subset is countable.
- Let . Then
THEOREM: Let be uncountable, then any set is uncountable.
- If is countable, then is finite or countably infinite
THEOREM: If are countably infinite, then so is
- // no elements will be included twice
- Application: the set of irrational numbers is uncountable
THEOREM: If are countably infinite, then so is
Schröder-Bernstein Theorem
QUESTION: How to compare the cardinality of sets in general?
THEOREM: If and , then .
EXAMPLE: Show that
- is injective
- is injective
EXAMPLE:
- is an injection.
- (, no )
- has a binary representation
- is an injection
THEOREM:
The Continuum Hypothesis: There is no cardinal number between and , i.e., there is no set such that .
Basic Rules of Counting
DEFINITION: Let be a finite set. A partition of set is a family of nonempty subsets of such that
- for all with .
The Sum Rule: Let be a finite set. Let be a partition of . Then .
The Product Rule: Let be finite sets. Then .
The Bijection Rule: Let and be two finite sets. If there is a bijection , then .
Permutations of Set
DEFINITION: Let and . An -permutation of is a sequence of distinct elements of A.
- An -permutation of is simply called a permutation of .
- The 2-permutations of are ; ; ; ; ;
THEOREM: An -element set has different -permutations.
DEFINITION: Let and . An -permutation of with repetition is a sequence of elements of .
- The 2-permutations of with repetition are:
- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
THEOREM: An -element set has different -permutations with repetition.
Multiset
DEFINITION: A multiset is a collection of elements which are not necessarily different from each other.
- An element has multiplicity if it appears times in .
- A multiset is called an -multiset if it has elements.
- : an -multiset
- has multiplicity for all .
- is called an -subset of if:
- for every , and
EXAMPLE: ,
- is a 106-multiset; the multiplicities of are , respectively.
- is a 99-subset of
Permutations of Multiset
DEFINITION: Let be an -multiset. A permutation of is a sequence of elements, where appears exactly times for every .
- -permutation of : a permutation of some -subset of
- Example:
- is a permutation of ; is a 3-permutation of ;
THEOREM: Let be a multiset. Then has exactly permutations.
REMARK: Let be a set of elements.
- -permutation of w/o repetition: -permutation of .
- -permutation of with repetition: -permutation of .
停机问题那个反证法逻辑太秀了,看完起鸡皮疙瘩。
对角线法那块绕得我脑壳疼
所以无穷大真的能分等级?有点颠覆认知。
连续统假设居然还没被证明或否定,有点意外
这证明看得我云里雾里
同感,数学证明好绕
能不能把构造b的步骤图示一下,我总是弄错哪一步,求大神指点。
这个b的构造方法确实精妙,但理解起来费劲。
康托尔对角线证明还挺巧妙
以前学到这里就卡住,现在再看还是头疼。
这证明真的好抽象。
抽象是必然,我自己也常被绕晕。
好像跟数数能力有关?
感觉这证明过程绕来绕去的,直接记结论算了。
是不是学了这个就能理解无穷大也有大小了?
哎,数学又坑我。
这课讲得这么硬核,听得进去的都是大神吧。
大神的世界,我等凡人看看就好。
所以(0,1)里的数就是数不完呗?
证明过程看晕了,结论我信了就行。
纯路人,这图里画的是啥?有人科普下不?
看不懂,直接划掉。
这个构造b的方法挺巧妙的,就是步骤太绕了。
对角线法太巧了。
实数比整数多?这数学世界真够魔幻的。
实数比整数多,太惊讶了。
这图真是绕晕脑袋。
证明过程是有点绕,但结论记住了就行。
之前学集合论卡在这好几天,现在也没完全搞懂😭
对角线法每次看都懵,有人能简单说说吗?
康托尔定理证明过程挺绕的
对角线证明太巧妙了
多重集排列公式记不住啊
同感,公式太绕了
多重集计数公式还挺实用的
幂集那部分概念挺难懂的
同感,这部分我也卡了很久
停机问题这部分有点烧脑
同感,这部分确实绕
这证明思路有点绕
康托尔对角线法挺有意思的
这证明过程绕得我有点晕
同感,绕来绕去的
数学证明总让人头大
看了好几遍,感觉这个证明过程的核心思想抓住了。
看不懂,但图挺好看的。
所以无穷大确实有不同的大小等级,对吧?
有没有更直观的例子来解释这个对角线法啊?
之前学集合论就卡在这,现在还是有点懵。
(0,1)区间居然比整数多?这数学逻辑简直在挑战常识啊
实数居然比整数多,数学果然反直觉。
基数不等这个结论太反直觉了,明明感觉都能数得清。
图里那个b的构造我好像有点懂了,但又没完全懂。
这个证明当初学的时候卡了好久,现在再看还是觉得精妙。
所以康托尔用这个方法证明了实数比整数多?
对角线法就是构造一个不在列表里的实数,挺巧妙的。
对角线法这图看着真绕,脑子有点转不过弯来🤔